CMP · compare the operating model
Ubirimi brings issue tracking, Agile planning, service management, documentation, communication, and practical team tools into one suite. The strongest difference is not the length of the feature list — it is how the products work together.
15 days · every product · no card on the form
The structural comparison
Atlassian offers a broad family of independently selected products. Ubirimi’s proposition is deliberately tighter: the complete product family shares a tenant, identity, and commercial model, while the core work surfaces share the Yongo issue.
Powerful products with distinct plan, packaging, and administration decisions.
Purpose-built products with one identity, one bill, and shared work where the connection matters.
Jira, Confluence, and Jira Service Management are distinct products, each with its own plans and feature set.
Ten products are included in one suite, under one tenant and one commercial relationship.
Jira work items anchor delivery while knowledge and service capabilities connect across products.
The Yongo issue is the shared record used by the tracker, Agile boards, and Help Desk queues.
Boards and backlogs live in Jira, with the capabilities available in the selected plan.
Agile boards are filter-scoped views of Yongo issues; moving a card runs a real workflow transition.
Confluence provides spaces and pages as a separately selected product.
Documentador provides spaces, nested pages, revisions, attachments, and PDF as part of the suite.
Jira Service Management provides portals, queues, and service-management capabilities.
Help Desk adds a customer portal, queues, SLAs, and organisations to Yongo projects without creating a second ticket record.
A broad platform with product, plan, and marketplace choices.
Issue types, fields, screens, workflows, permissions, notifications, and security schemes are tenant data — including their display names.
Licensing and plan choices are evaluated per product and user population.
One headcount band includes every product, with updates included.
Cloud is the main offering; Data Center is Atlassian’s self-managed line.
Choose Ubirimi Cloud or run the same suite on infrastructure you control.
This is a comparison of product shape and operating model, not a claim of one-for-one feature parity. Atlassian packaging changes over time; verify current details on its official cloud licensing page.
Why teams choose Ubirimi
The suite is designed to reduce duplicate records, forced vocabulary, procurement sprawl, and the habit of using one heavyweight tool for every kind of work.
An issue can appear in Yongo search, on an Agile board, or in a Help Desk queue. The key, history, permissions, and workflow remain the same.
Administrators define issue types, fields, screens, workflow steps, conditions, post-functions, roles, and schemes for each tenant and project.
Statuses, priorities, resolutions, issue types, and project terminology are stored as customer data. Teams do not have to adopt a hardcoded English catalogue.
Use Yongo when work needs governance. Use Quick Tasks or Quick Notes when it does not. Both choices live in the same suite.
Documentador keeps governed pages and revisions; Answers preserves reusable expertise; Chat remains the place for conversation, not the only record of a decision.
Start in the cloud or discuss an on-premise deployment. The product family and operating model remain recognisably the same.
How the products work together
A product should add a useful perspective without creating another source of truth. That principle defines the hand-offs below.
CAPTURE
Create a Yongo issue directly, or let a customer raise a request through the Help Desk portal. Agents and delivery teams work from the same underlying record.
PLAN
A saved Yongo filter can power an Agile board. Backlog and sprint planning organise the work; dragging a card invokes an allowed Yongo transition.
DELIVER
Fields, comments, mentions, attachments, work logs, links, watchers, and history stay on the issue while dashboards report on the same data.
RETAIN
Turn durable guidance into a versioned Documentador page or a searchable Answers thread. Keep temporary notes, cards, and file handoffs deliberately lightweight.
Share data where continuity matters. Keep separate tools where a different weight of work makes people more effective.
The complete product family
Use the core work system for governed delivery, the knowledge tools for organisational memory, and the quick tools when simplicity is the feature.
CORE
Three perspectives on delivery and service, grounded in the same issue model.
The configurable system of record for issues, projects, workflows, search, dashboards, permissions, and history.
Explore Yongo → AGL Scrum & KanbanScrum and Kanban planning on Yongo filters and transitions — a visual surface, not a parallel tracker.
Explore Agile → HLP Service managementCustomer-facing intake, agent queues, SLA clocks, and organisations on selected Yongo projects.
Explore Help Desk →TEAM
Separate tools for durable documentation, reusable answers, conversation, and shared time.
Spaces, nested pages, restorable revisions, comments, watchers, attachments, and PDF export.
Explore Documentador → ANS Q&A communityStructured internal Q&A with domains, voting, comments, search, and contributor profiles.
Explore Answers → CHT Team messagingWorkspaces, channels, and direct messages for the conversation that moves work between formal updates.
Explore Chat → CAL Events & remindersShared calendars, recurring events, guests, reminders, and visibility for when work happens.
Explore Calendar →QUICK
Useful places for work that does not yet need a workflow, page tree, or long-lived repository.
Personal notebooks, movable notes, and tags for ideas that may not be ready to become shared work.
Explore Quick Notes → QTK Lightweight boardsLightweight boards, lists, and cards with members, comments, teams, and attachments.
Explore Quick Tasks → QTR File dropA direct upload, notification, and download path when an email attachment is the wrong tool.
Explore Quick Transfer →Where Ubirimi is strongest
See the difference with your own process
We will show how they map into Ubirimi — including what should stay simple and what deserves a governed scheme.
FAQ
⌘K · jump
ubirimi